The Photodynamic Agent Designed by Involvement of Hydrogen Atom Transfer for Enhancing Photodynamic Therapy

Firstly, I want to express my sincere congratulations to Zhuo Fan, my graduate mentor, whose paper was recently accepted by 《Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.》! This project has been a fascinating work for all of us involved, including Yuanyuan Xu, Kunxu Teng, Professor Yang, and Professor Niu. Looking back, I see it as an inspiring and exploratory journey that deepened my enthusiasm for this field and allowed me to contribute to the synthesis work and the writing of supporting information. So I wanna write this blog to introduce and look back this work.

Classic PDT Process

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising cancer treatment method that employs photosensitizers (PSs), molecular oxygen and light to generate cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) that kill cancer cells. PDT has been used in the treatment of a variety of tumors (e.g. skin, esophageal and bladder cancers). With advancements in endoscopy and fiber-optic technologies, PDT holds great potential for the treatment of solid tumors, including gastric, liver and cervical cancers. However, hypoxia, a common trait of malignant solid tumors, poses a challenge to PDT efficacy due to its heavy reliance on oxygen concentration. Addressing this challenge, the development of hypoxia-tolerant PSs that maintain high phototoxicity in hypoxic environments is crucial for improving PDT efficacy to solid tumors. Recent advancements have demonstrated that Type-I PDT exhibits reduced dependence on oxygen concentration compared with traditional Type-II PDT. Type-I PSs not only generate ROS (e.g., superoxide radicals and hydroxyl radicals) but also directly damage biomolecules through electron/hydrogen atom transfer between excited PSs and biological substrates.

Designing effective Type I PSs is challenging because various excited-state decay processes compete with energy transfer. One design strategy is to introduce electron donors or acceptors to enhance electron transfer efficiency. However, achieving a balance between efficient electron transfer and maintaining high oxidation potential is complex. Strong electron donors, while enabling effective electron transfer, can lower the PS’s oxidation potential, thus reducing its ability to oxidize biomolecules effectively.

Beginning of this idea

Our idea to address this balance emerged from an unexpected observation: during a synthesis of a BODIPY-triphenylamine derivative, we found that the compound turned dark under UV light on TLC plates, likely due to the reactive benzyl position of triphenylamine. This reminded us of an earlier study where we synthesized a polymer containing both a photosensitizer monomer and an electron donor monomer, which, interestingly, also had a benzyl position. Unexpectedly, this polymer demonstrated exceptional cytotoxicity, but we didn’t figure it out then. Upon realizing that both might be linked to the highly reactive benzyl position, we searched for references and sketched a proposed catalytic cycle that could explain this unusual reactivity. We hypothesized that a covalent bond between PS and triphenylamine could enable a photoinduced electron transfer, generating BODIPY anion and triphenylamine cation radicals. The BODIPY anion radical could transfer electrons to oxygen, creating O₂⁻•, while the benzyl cation radical could oxidize some biomolecules through hydrogen atom transfer.

The proposed mechanism in our work

Guided by this idea, we synthesized our target molecule, BFBnT (Bodipy-Fluorene-Bn-TPA). The triphenylamine group acts as the electron donor, while the BODIPY core, modified with fluorene at the 3,5 positions to maximize absorption to PDT wavelength window and iodine at the 2,6 positions for intersystem crossing efficiency(ICT), serves as the electron acceptor. After further optimization of the linker structure through click chemistry, we synthesized a control molecule, BFT (Bodipy-Fluorene-TPA), without the benzyl position.

Target molecule BFBnT(compound 1) and control molecule BFT(compound 2)

Synthesis of target molecule

Our synthesis begins with a Williamson ether synthesis reaction, where we reacted p-hydroxybenzaldehyde with an excess of 1-bromo-2-chloroethane to introduce the desired ether linkage. Afterward, we conducted a reaction with pyrrole in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) as a acid catalyst, allowing it to proceed overnight to form a dipyrromethane intermediate.

Next, at a low temperature of -78°C, we performed selective chlorination on the pyrrole ring using N-chlorosuccinimide (NCS). This was followed by oxidation with tetrachloro-p-benzoquinone for one hour. Then we added triethylamine and coordinated boron trifluoride etherate, forming the dichloro-BODIPY core structure (compound 3).

To modify this core, we utilized the Suzuki-Miyaura coupling reaction to introduce fluorene groups at the 3 and 5 positions, enhancing the compound’s conjugation. In the next step, azide groups were introduced through nucleophilic substitution. Lastly, we iodinated the electron-rich 2 and 6 positions using N-iodosuccinimide (NIS) to introduce heavy atom effect, further improving intersystem crossing efficiency, completing the Bodipy synthesis part.

In the synthesis of the triphenylamine segment, we began by introducing an alkyne group through a nucleophilic substitution reaction. This allowed us to connect it with the azide-functionalized BODIPY block via a click reaction—a coupling method I especially enjoy for its efficiency and reliability. Then we get the target molecule BFBnT(PS 1) and the control molecule BFT(PS 2).

Reveal the HAT mechanism behind

Next, we performed detailed mechanistic characterization to understand the reaction pathway. To confirm the formation of carbon-centered radicals, we utilized radical trapping, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), and electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy.

We explored methods to further confirm the presence of intermediate carbon radicals. For example, we attempted to detect these intermediates using deuterated NADH analogs in a hydrogen-deuterium exchange experiment.

synthesis of d-NADH analogs for H-D exchange experiment
The H-D exchange experiment.
we aimed to capture deuterium-substituted BFBnT at the benzyl position via H-D exchange experiments. We planned to characterize this process using HRMS and 1H NMR, specifically tracking the decrease in benzyl proton integration after irradiation.

However, sadly, the result was not obvious, so we turned to use spin-trapping techniques.

Using spin-trapping techniques, we employed TEMPO to capture carbon-centered radicals and DMPO to target both carbon and superoxide anion radicals. This approach allowed us to verify the formation of stable radical adducts, which we subsequently analyzed with HRMS and ESR spectroscopy to ensure precise identification.

a) ESR spectra to detect C• and HOO• generated by PS 1 (0.2 mM) in DMSO under light-irradiation, using DMPO (10 mM) as a spin trap agent.
b) HRMS spectrum of the irradiated mixture of PS 1 and TEMPO.

The study of photo-induced electron transfer

Subsequently, we delved into computational and electrochemical analyses to better understand the electron transfer mechanisms.

The Gibbs free energy change for electron transfer from donors D1/D2 to acceptor A can be calculated using the Weller equation (1). In this equation, 𝐸𝐷+•𝐷 represents the initial potential for one-electron oxidation of the electron donor, while 𝐸𝐴/𝐴 is the initial potential for oneelectron reduction of the electron acceptor. By converting the wavelength axis to an energy scale, 𝐸00 can be estimated at the intersection of the normalized absorbance and emission spectra of A.

We then synthesized model compounds A, D1, and D2, followed by detailed electrochemical studies.、

synthesis of A
synthesis of D1, D2

Electrochemical measurements show that D1 has oxidation potentials of +1.035 V vs. Fc/Fc+ , D2 has oxidation potentials of +0.75 V vs. Fc/Fc+ and the A has reduction potentials of -0.681 V vs. Fc/Fc+. The excited state energy E00 is estimated to be 1.99 eV. Rehm-Weller theory calculations reveal that the Gibbs free energy changes (ΔG) for photoinduced electron transfer are thermodynamically favorable: -26.04 kJ/mol for the transfer from excited-state D1 to A , and -54.0 kJ/mol for the transfer from excited-state D2 to A. These results indicate that electron transfer in both processes is feasible.

Cyclic voltammogram of a) D1 and A; c) D2 and A; f) A (1.0 mM) included Ferrocene (Fc, 1.0 mM) in DCM with (n-Bu)4N+PF6 (0.1 M) as a supporting electrolyte, Ag/Ag+ as a reference electrode, glassy carbon electrode as a working electrode and Pt wire as a counter electrode; scan rate, 100 mVs-1 . The Gibbs free energy of electron transfer between b) D1 and A, d) D2 and A were calculated according to the Rehm-Weller equation. e) Normalized absorption and fluorescence spectra of A in DCM.

PDT Application

We encapsulated BFBnT (PS 2) as nanoparticles using Tween 60, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of their reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation capacity, NADH oxidation capabilities, and in vitro and in vivo performance.

1O2 Production – ABDA Assay

a) The mechanism of 9,10-anthracenediyl-bis(methylene)dimalonic acid (ABDA) as the scavenger monitors 1O2 in solution. The absorption spectra of ABDA (60 μM) after irradiation (590 nm, 30 mW/cm²) for varying durations in the presence of b) PS 1 (10 μM); c) PS 2 (10 μM).

To evaluate 1O2 production, we employed the commercial probe ABDA (anthracene-9,10-dipropionic acid disodium salt), a water-soluble anthracene derivative that reacts with 1O2, resulting in photobleaching to form endoperoxides. This reaction was monitored by observing a characteristic decrease in absorbance around 400 nm in the UV-Vis spectrum.

·OH Production – 1,4-Dicarboxybenzene Assay

a) The mechanism of 1,4-dicarboxybenzene as the •OH fluorescent probe monitors hydroxyl radical generation in solution. The fluorescence spectra of the solution (excitation at 310 nm, detection from 390 nm to 500 nm) containing 60 μM 1,4-dicarboxybenzene after irradiation (590 nm, 30 mW/cm2) for varying durations in the presence of b) PS 1 (10 μM) and c) PS 2 (10 μM) dispersed in PBS.

We used 1,4-dicarboxybenzene as a probe for detecting ·OH, which can add to aromatic rings. The formation of ·OH was assessed by measuring fluorescence emissions between 390 nm and 500 nm.

O2 Production- DHE Assay

a) The mechanism of droethidium (DHE) as the scavenger monitors O2−• in the solution. Fluorescence spectra of DHE (40 μM, excited at 510 nm, with detection ranging from 525 nm to 660 nm) containing 250 μg/mL ctDNA were measured after exposure to a 590 nm LED light at 10 mW/cm² over various time intervals. Measurements were taken in the presence of b) PS 2 (10 μM) and c) DHE and ctDNA alone.   

The capability of the photosensitizer to generate O2 was tested using dihydroethidium (DHE), a widely used probe for O2 detection in live cells. Upon cell uptake, DHE is dehydrogenated by intracellular O2 to produce ethidium, which binds to DNA and emits red fluorescence.

We also did the test of NADH oxidation capabilities, and in vitro and in vivo performance to characterize its photodynamic therapy efficiency.

a) Detection of O2−• in PS 1-treated HeLa cells with DHE under normoxic and hypoxic conditions, respectively. DHE: detection from 570 to 620 nm, excitation at 562 nm. Light: 590 nm, 10 mW/cm2. Irradiation time: 10 min. b) Detection of intracellular NADH levels in Hela cells subjected to various concentrations of PS 1. Data were presented as mean ± s.d. derived from n = 3 independent biological samples. Cell viability of HeLa cells subjected to varying concentrations ofPS 1 c) in the absence of or d) in the present of light-irradiation (590 nm, 10 mW/cm2, 10 min) under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. e) Cell viability of HeLa cells subjected to varying concentrations of PS 2 under light-irradiation (590 nm, 10 mW/cm2, 10 min) under normoxic or hypoxic conditions. f) Body weight of the mice during the observation. g) Tumor growth profiles during the observation. h) Images of tumor tissues from different groups of tumor-bearing mice. i) Average tumor weight of different groups of tumor-bearing mice. Data in f), g) and i) are presented as mean ± s.d. derived from n=5 independent biological samples. Statistical significance was assessed via unpaired two-sided student t-test, ****p<0.0001.

Conclusion

In summary, this work presents a novel design strategy for Type-I photosensitizer with the involvement of hydrogen atom transfer (HAT). HAT-involved Type-I photosensitizer PS 1 was developed, as a proof of concept. It simultaneously produces carbon-centered radicals to oxidize NADH and generates superoxide radicals under light-irradiation.

No Comments

Send Comment Edit Comment


				
Previous
Next